Methodology for diagnosing social and psychological attitudes of an individual in the motivational-need sphere of O.F.Potemkina. Potemkina Methodology about Potemkina online

Description

Methodology for diagnosing socio-psychological attitudes of an individual in the motivational-need sphere O.F. Potemkina consists of 80 questions about what is important in life.

The first part (40 questions) shows what is more important for a person: altruism or egoism, process or result.

The second part (the next 40 questions) is aimed at assessing the importance of freedom or power, the content of work or money.

Key to the test

Part I. Identification of attitudes “altruism - egoism”, “process - result”:

process orientation: 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37;
result orientation: 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38;
orientation towards altruism: 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39;
orientation towards egoism: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40.

Part II. Identification of the attitudes “freedom - power”, “labor - money”:

work orientation: 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37;
freedom orientation: 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38;
orientation to power: 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39;
money orientation: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40.

Processing and analysis

For each “Yes” answer, 1 point is awarded. The sum of values for each of the eight personality attitudes is calculated.

It is advisable to present the results obtained using these methods graphically.

To do this, you need to draw four vertical intersecting lines and mark off on each of them from the center (point 0) the number of points according to the questionnaire keys.

Interpretation of the result

The values on the scales indicate the importance for a person of each of the types of motives described below. It is important not only which (or which) of these values is the largest, but also how they relate to each other and which of them is the smallest.

Process orientation

With large values on the scale, a person has a process orientation. When working or other activities, it is important for him that the activity itself is interesting. He thinks relatively little about achieving his goal, so, for example, he may be late with submitting his work. And if the process has become uninteresting to him, he can completely abandon this activity, without thinking about the consequences. But on the other hand, it is easier for a person with such an attitude to cope with a task where the process itself is important, for example, acting in a theater.

Typically, people are more process-oriented, think less about achieving results, are often late in delivering work, and their process orientation hinders their effectiveness. They are driven more by interest in the task, and to achieve results requires a lot of routine work, a negative attitude towards which they cannot overcome.

Result oriented

Large values on the scale indicate a focus on results. A person strives to achieve results in his activities in spite of everything - vanity, interference, failures... He can be one of the most reliable employees. But in his desire to achieve a result, he can forget about everything else, for example, unintentionally harm someone or simply do something quickly but ugly (“drive a bulldozer”).

Altruistic orientation

With large values on the scale, a person has an attitude of altruism, of acting primarily for the benefit of others, often to the detriment of himself (and the cause). These are people worth caring about. Altruism is the most valuable social motivation, the presence of which distinguishes a mature person. Traditionally, this attitude is considered valuable, and the person who has it deserves all respect. Indeed, probably the greatest deeds of good were committed out of altruism - but also evil, we note, too. An altruist can be very dangerous for himself and those around him when he begins to selflessly drive humanity (or just a family or group) into happiness. But if he does not allow himself to do this, then he can be extremely useful to others and at the same time feel happy from this, regardless of his personal situation. Although it is dangerous to let him, say, into the financial management of a commercial organization... If altruism causes excessive harm, although it may seem unreasonable, it brings happiness.

Selfishness orientation

When available great importance according to the scale, a person is focused mainly on his personal interests. This does not necessarily mean that his interests are limited to material gain - just when making decisions, he very seriously takes into account how their consequences will affect him personally. Both an evil thief and a miser, and simply a completely moral and kind person who adheres to reasonable selfishness can have such an attitude. People with excessively expressed egoism are quite rare. A certain amount of reasonable egoism cannot harm a person. Rather, its absence is more harmful, and this occurs quite often among people of intelligent professions.

Work orientation

A high value on the scale indicates an attitude towards work. A person uses all his time to do something, not sparing weekends, vacations, etc. Work itself brings him more joy and pleasure than other activities. In contrast to the process mindset, it is important for a person to feel that he is not just busy, but that he is working. At the same time, how effective this work actually is is of little importance, but what is important is how much it is approved by management or society. Thus, such an attitude is one of the reasons for continuing work when wages are not paid and cannot be paid in principle, since no one needs the products.

Money orientation

With large values on the scale, a person has a money mindset. The leading value for people with this orientation is the desire to increase their well-being. When such a person does not have money, he thinks mainly about how to get it, and when he has it, how not to lose it and increase its quantity. Money for him has value in itself, and not just as a means of acquiring something. He won’t necessarily begin to, say, steal them, but when choosing a job for himself, he will most likely pay attention to the salary than to the interestingness.

Freedom Orientation

With large values on the scale, a person has an attitude towards freedom. She is the main value for him. He does not tolerate any restrictions and is ready to make sacrifices in order to defend his independence (sometimes from imaginary danger). Very often, an orientation towards freedom is combined with an orientation towards work, less often it is a combination of freedom and money.

Power Orientation

A high value on the scale means that the person has a power mindset. He wants to feel in control over other people and is willing to go to great lengths to achieve this. He may end up being a tyrant, but he can also become a good leader. For people with this orientation, the leading value is influence on others, on society.

A person with any attitude (more precisely, with a set of attitudes; quite rarely, only one attitude turns out to be completely dominant, i.e., the values on other scales are sharply smaller) can find it completely useful place in society, and his own way of destroying everything around him. But why (and partly how) a person will do this or that is shown by the results of this test and the Thomas questionnaire “Method for diagnosing a person’s predisposition to conflict behavior.” Knowledge of features motivational sphere a person is important in professional selection, career guidance and personal counseling, in particular family counseling. Differences in attitudes between spouses often cause discord in family relationships.

It should be noted that based on the results of using the techniques, it is possible to identify several groups of subjects:

1) a group of highly motivated subjects with harmonious orientations. All orientations are expressed strongly and equally;

2) a group of low-motivated subjects in whom all orientations are extremely weakly expressed;

3) a group of subjects with disharmonious orientations, in which some orientations are strongly expressed, while others may even be absent.

Zaverokhina+++Methodology “Ability to self-government” (SSU test) N. M. Peisakhova

Options: Analysis of contradictions or orientation in a situation, Forecasting, Goal setting, Planning, Decision making, Evaluation criteria, Self-control, Correction. 48 questions

The methodology “Ability for self-government” (SSU test) by N. M. Peysakhov to identify the ability for self-government was developed in the laboratory of psychological problems high school Kazansky State University N.M. Peysakhov and his collaborators based on the theoretical framework they themselves developed. The methodology contains 48 statements with which you can agree or disagree. Self-management is a purposeful change, and the goal is set by a person who manages his own forms of activity: communication, behavior, activities and experiences. Self-government must be distinguished from self-regulation.

Self-government is a creative process; it is associated with the creation of something new, encountering an unusual situation or contradiction, the need to set new goals, and search for new solutions and means of achieving goals.

Self-regulation is also changes, but made within the framework of existing rules, norms, and stereotypes. The function of self-regulation is different - to consolidate what is acquired in the process of self-government. Thus, self-government and self-regulation are not two different processes, but two sides of personality activity, a dialectical unity of a person’s subjective world that is changeable and stable in the continuous development.

Methodology of ability of self-government (SSU test) N. M. Peysakhov: Instructions for the SSU test. The proposed questionnaire makes it possible to learn about the ability to control oneself in various situations. The questionnaire contains two groups of statements: Statements that require reference to experience, for example, point 5. If you really often evaluate your actions and actions, try to find an answer to the question posed, then feel free to answer “yes”, and if you rarely do this , then answer “no”. Statements characterizing your attitude to generally accepted opinion, for example, paragraph 28.

If you agree with the opinion, then answer “yes”, and if you disagree, then answer “no”. The answer “yes” is indicated by “+”, the answer “no” is indicated by “-” (minus).

Test material (questions).

1. Practice shows that I correctly determine my capabilities in any activity.

2. I am a prudent person.

3. I only take on what I can complete.

4. I usually have a good idea of what needs to be done to achieve my plans.

5. I am constantly trying to find the answer to the question “What is good and what is bad?”

6. Before making the final step, I weigh the pros and cons.

7. I am always aware of what is happening to me.

8. Unforeseen obstacles do not prevent me from completing my task.

9. I don’t have the patience to spend a long time figuring out something that can’t be solved right away.

10. I don’t like to look too far ahead in my actions and deeds.

11. I rarely think about the main goals of my life.

12. The lack of thoughtful plans does not prevent me from achieving good results.

13. I often find it difficult to say whether I have achieved what I wanted.

14. My decisions are influenced not by my goals, but by my mood at the moment.

15. It often seems to me that a whole hour or two has disappeared to no one knows where.

16. Anyone who considers it necessary to correct all mistakes made does not notice how he makes new ones.

17. When I need to understand a difficult situation, I feel a surge of energy and strength.

18. I have a clear picture of my life prospects.

19. I know how to refuse everything that distracts me from my goal.

20. In my actions and words I follow the proverb: “Measure seven times, cut once.”

21. I spend a lot of time understanding from what positions I need to evaluate my actions.

22. In my actions, I successfully combine risk with prudence.

23. The need to check myself has become second nature to me.

24. When my relationships with people deteriorate, I can change them.

25. As a rule, it is difficult for me to highlight the main thing in the current situation.

26. Life shows that my predictions rarely come true.

27. People who always clearly know what they want seem too rational to me.

28. Luck accompanies those who do not plan in advance, but rely on the natural course of events.

29. I lack a sense of proportion in relationships with loved ones.

30. I feel overwhelmed by the need to make urgent decisions.

31. I usually pay little attention to my speech.

32. I would willingly change some of my habits if I knew how to do it.

33. What I want and what I should do is the subject of my constant thoughts.

34. I know in advance what actions can be expected from people.

35. I usually clearly imagine the future result from the very beginning.

36. Until I have a clear, specific plan in my head, I don’t start a serious conversation.

37. I always have exact guidelines by which I evaluate my work.

38. I always consider the consequences of the decisions I make.

39. I carefully monitor whether I am understood during arguments.

40. I am ready again and again to improve already completed work.

41. No matter how much I analyze my life’s difficulties, I cannot achieve complete clarity.

42. Life is so complicated that I think it’s a waste of time to anticipate the course of events.

43. Following a goal once set makes life very poor.

44. I believe that whether you plan or not, circumstances are always stronger.

45.V Lately I find myself attaching great importance to little things, forgetting about the main thing.

46. I usually fail to find the right solution because large quantity possible options.

47. In quarrels, I don’t notice how I “lose my temper.”

48. Having done a job, I prefer not to correct even obvious mistakes.

The degree of expression of socio-psychological attitudes.

What is more in me: altruism or selfishness?
What am I more focused on: the process or the result?
What do I want more: freedom or power?
What is more important to me now: work or money?

Methodology of Olga Fedorovna Potemkina “Diagnostics of socio-psychological attitudes of the individual in the motivational-need sphere”. Consists of 80 questions, they are aimed at identifying the degree of expression of socio-psychological attitudes towards:

“altruism - egoism”, “process - result” (40 questions),
“freedom - power”, “labor - money” (40 questions).

Potemkina Olga Fedorovna

Scientific and organizational activities are related to a wide range of psychological issues: socio-cultural and psychological diagnostics, psychology of training and education, social, political, economic psychology, psychological counseling, theory and psychology of management, problems of competitiveness and electoral technologies, strategic planning and investment activities. Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor. Doctoral dissertation: “Socio-psychological mechanisms of adaptation and personality development.” More than a hundred publications have been published, including books on problems of psychology, improving management, electoral technologies, strategic planning and investment activities.

Scientific publications of O.F. Potemkina are related to problems in the field experimental psychology, psychophysiology and psychology of individual differences, psychological diagnostics.

=================================================================

About the scales:

Process orientation. Typically, people are more process-oriented, think less about achieving results, are often late in delivering work, and their process orientation hinders their effectiveness; they are driven more by interest in the task, and to achieve results requires a lot of routine work, a negative attitude towards which they cannot overcome.

Result oriented. Results-oriented people are among the most reliable. They can achieve results in their activities despite the hustle and bustle, obstacles, and failures.

Altruistic orientation. People who are guided by altruistic values, often to their own detriment, deserve all respect. These are people worth caring about. Altruism is the most valuable social motivation, the presence of which distinguishes a mature person. If altruism is excessively harmful, although it may seem unreasonable, it brings happiness.

Selfishness orientation. People with excessively expressed egoism are quite rare. A certain amount of “reasonable egoism” cannot harm a person. Rather, its absence is more harmful, and this occurs quite often among people of “intelligent professions.”

Work orientation. Typically, work-oriented people use all their time to do something, not sparing weekends, vacations, etc. Work brings them more joy and pleasure than any other activity.

Money orientation. The leading value for people with this orientation is the desire to increase their well-being.

Freedom Orientation. The main value for these people is freedom. Very often, an orientation towards freedom is combined with an orientation towards work, less often it is a combination of “freedom” and “money”.

Power Orientation. For people with this orientation, the leading value is influence on others, on society.

It is advisable to present the results obtained using these methods graphically. To do this, you need to draw two vertical intersecting lines and put aside on each of the four straight lines from the center (point 0) the number of points according to the questionnaire keys.

It is more clear when such a profile is presented in the form of a radar chart.

=================================================================

If you wish, you can send (free!) test results to your inbox

=================================================================

Instructions

Answer each question “Yes” if it accurately describes your behavior and “No” if your behavior does not correspond to what the question says. Answer quickly and accurately. Remember that there are no “good” or “bad” answers.

You can also express your spontaneous thoughts next to each question (in the COMMENTS field)

The methodology for diagnosing the socio-psychological attitudes of an individual in the motivational-need sphere was developed by O.F. Potemkina and is a questionnaire of 80 questions with the same answer options “Yes” and “No” for each. In the process of creation, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, practicing psychologist, professor Olga Fedorovna Potemkina was guided by the works of the Soviet psychologist D. Uznadze, who drew inspiration from the works of the Swiss psychiatrist C. Jung and the German sociologist and philosopher E. Fromm. This technique is quite widespread in management and deserves trust.

The purpose of the technique is to identify the degree of expression of socio-psychological attitudes. The test uses 8 different scales:

Process orientation
Result oriented
Altruistic orientation
Selfishness orientation
Work orientation
Money orientation
Freedom Orientation
Power Orientation

The Potemkina test is well suited for adults who already have professional experience.

Instructions for the Potemkina test “Diagnostics of socio-psychological attitudes of the individual in the motivational-need sphere”

You will be asked 80 questions with “Yes” and “No” answer options for each. Please select “Yes” if the statement in the question correctly describes your usual behavior and “No” if it does not.

Test time: 10-15 minutes.

Possible test audience: adults

Test cost: for free

Test result: will become available immediately after answering all the proposed questions in the form of a list of scales used with the resulting value and verbal description.

O.F. Potemkina’s method for diagnosing socio-psychological attitudes of an individual in the motivational-need sphere consists of 80 questions that provide answers to the questions “What is important in life?”

The first part, 40 questions, shows what is more important for a person: altruism or egoism, process or result.

The second part, the next 40 questions, is aimed at assessing the importance of freedom or power, the content of work or money.

Methodology for diagnosing socio-psychological attitudes of an individual in the motivational-need sphere by O.F. Potemkina:

Instructions for Potemkina's technique.

Answer each question “yes” if it accurately describes your behavior and “no” if your behavior does not correspond to what the question says.

Stimulus material (questions):

Identification of the degree of expression of socio-psychological attitudes aimed at “altruism - egoism”, “process - result”

Does the process of the work being performed captivate you more than the stage of its completion?
Do you usually spare no effort to achieve your goal?
Are you often told that you think more about others than about yourself?
Do you usually spend a lot of time on your person?
Do you usually hesitate for a long time to start doing something that is not interesting to you, even if it is necessary?
Are you sure that you have more perseverance than ability?
Is it easier for you to ask for others than for yourself?
Do you think that a person should think about himself first, and then about others?
When finishing an interesting task, do you often regret that the interesting work has already been completed, and it’s a pity to part with it?
Do you prefer active people who are capable of achieving results than just kind and sympathetic people?
Do you find it difficult to refuse people when they ask you for something?
Do you enjoy doing things for yourself more than for others?
Do you enjoy playing a game where you don't have to think about winning?
Do you think there are more successes in your life than failures?
Do you often try to do people a favor if they have trouble or trouble?
Are you convinced that you don’t need to work hard for anyone?
Do you most respect people who are truly passionate about something?
Do you often complete work despite unfavorable conditions, lack of time, or outside interference?
Do you usually have neither time nor energy for yourself?
Do you find it difficult to force yourself to do something for others?
Do you often start many things at the same time and do not have time to finish them?
Do you think that you have enough strength to expect success in life?
Do you strive to do as much as possible for other people?
Are you convinced that caring for others often comes at the expense of yourself?
Can you get so carried away by something that you forget about time and yourself?
Do you often manage to finish what you started?
Are you convinced that the greatest value in life is to live in the interests of other people?
Can you call yourself an egoist?
Does it happen that you, being carried away by details and delving into them, cannot finish the job you started?
Do you avoid meeting people who lack business skills?
Is your defining characteristic unselfish?
Do you use your free time for your hobbies?
Do you often fill up your vacation or weekend with work because you promised someone to do something?
Do you judge people who don't know how to take care of themselves?
Do you find it difficult to decide to use a person's efforts to your advantage?
Do you often ask people to do things for selfish reasons?
When agreeing to a business, do you think more about how interesting it is to you?
Is the desire for results in any business your distinctive feature?
Your distinctive feature is the ability to help other people?
Are you able to do your best only for a good reward?

Identification of the degree of expression of socio-psychological attitudes aimed at “freedom - power”, “work - money”

Do you agree that the most important thing in life is to be a master of your craft?
Do you value the ability to choose your own solution most of all?
Do your friends consider you a powerful person?
Do you agree that people who do not know how to make money are not worthy of respect?
Is creative work the main pleasure in life for you?
The main desire in your life is freedom, not power and money?
Do you agree that having power over people is the most important value?
Are your friends wealthy people?
Do you want everyone around you to be busy doing something exciting?
Do you always manage to follow your beliefs despite outside demands?
Do you think that the most important quality for power is its strength?
Are you sure that everything can be bought with money?
Do you choose friends based on their business skills?
Do you try not to bind yourself to various obligations to other people?
Do you feel resentful if someone does not comply with your demands?
Is money much more reliable than power and freedom?
Are you unbearably bored without your favorite job?
Are you convinced that everyone should have freedom within the framework of the law?
Is it easy for you to get people to do what you want?
Do you agree that it is better to have a high salary than high intelligence?
In life, are you only happy with excellent work results?
The most important desire in your life is to be free?
Do you consider yourself capable of leading a large team?
Is earning money your main aspiration in life?
Is your favorite activity more valuable to you than power and money?
Do you usually manage to win your right to freedom?
Do you have a thirst for power, a desire to lead?
Do you agree that money “doesn’t smell” and it doesn’t matter how it’s earned?
Even when you're on vacation, you can't help but work?
Are you willing to sacrifice a lot to be free?
Do you feel like a master in your family?
Do you find it difficult to limit yourself with money?
Do your friends and acquaintances value you as a specialist?
Do people who infringe on your freedom cause you the greatest indignation?
Can power replace many other values for you?
Do you usually manage to save the required amount of money?
Is labor the greatest value for you?
Do you feel confident and at ease among strangers?
Are you willing to infringe on freedom in order to have power?
The most severe shock for you is the lack of money?

The key to Potemkina's technique.

Part one: identifying attitudes towards “altruism - egoism”, “process - result”:

"Process orientation": 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37
"Result oriented ": 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38
"Altruistic orientation": 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39
""Orientation towards selfishness"": 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40

Part two: identifying the attitudes “freedom – power”, “labor – money”:

"Work orientation": 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37
"Freedom Orientations": 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38
"Power Orientation": 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39
"Money Orientation": 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40

Processing and analysis of the Potemkina test.

For each “yes” answer, 1 point is awarded. The sum of values for each of the eight personality attitudes is calculated.

Interpretation of the results obtained.

People are more process-oriented, think less about achieving results, are often late in delivering work, and their procedural focus hinders their effectiveness; they are driven more by interest in the task, and to achieve results requires a lot of routine work, a negative attitude towards which they cannot overcome.

Results-oriented people are among the most reliable. They can achieve results in their activities despite the hustle and bustle, obstacles, and failures.

People who are guided by altruistic values, often to their own detriment, deserve all respect. Altruism is the most valuable social motivation, the presence of which distinguishes a mature person.

People with excessively expressed egoism are quite rare. A certain amount of “reasonable egoism” cannot harm a person. Rather, its absence is more harmful, and this occurs quite often among people of “intelligent professions.”

Work-oriented people use all their time to do something, not sparing weekends, vacations, etc. Work brings them more joy and pleasure than any other activity. The leading value for money-oriented people is the desire to increase their well-being.

The main value for freedom-oriented people is freedom. Very often, an orientation towards freedom is combined with an orientation towards work, less often it is a combination of “freedom” and “money”.

For people with a power orientation, the leading value is influence on others, on society.

Graphic image for Potemkina's test.

Rating 4.75 (2 Votes)