Apocalypse of Maltsev. How the security forces are not waiting, but preparing for the revolution predicted by the Saratov oppositionist. The digital code of the bloody revolution being prepared by liberals and neo-Nazis has been deciphered

Two Russians - three marches

The Ministry of Internal Affairs reported more than three hundred people were detained for “attempting to organize mass riots,” and about 100 more people were arrested on the eve of X-Day, which nationalist blogger Vyacheslav Maltsev appointed on November 5. However, as it turned out, some remained free. I spoke with one of Maltsev’s active supporters.

Since 2013, in almost all episodes of his video blog “Artpodgotovka,” Maltsev has stated that the revolution in Russia will happen on November 5, 2017, because this is “the deadline for everything to ripen.” As a result, Maltsev himself was accused of extremism in Russia, and he was forced to go abroad. But even from France, Maltsev called on his supporters to go to city centers on this day.

In his rhetoric, Maltsev exploited the nationalist idea and called himself a national democrat, but, according to real participants in the nationalist movement, his attitude towards them was very conditional. According to one of the nationalist leaders, who is now also in political exile, Yuri Gorsky, Maltsev is rather a Marxist-Leninist. According to Gorsky, he supported Maltsev’s idea when it was presented in a completely different form. The point was that Maltsev, having been elected to parliament, would impeach the current president on November 5th.

However, when Gorsky stood up with a single picket calling for impeachment on the dates indicated by Maltsev near the State Duma building, the author of the idea was indignant - apparently, even then he understood that he would not get into the State Duma.

By the way, one of the versions of Maltsev’s failed revolution is that he was initially a provocateur acting in the interests of the special services. The logic of supporters of this version is clear: nationalists are one of the most radical members of the opposition movement, and if they are identified and neutralized, the protest will become much more harmless. This is exactly what, according to supporters of the “conspiracy theory,” Maltsev and his supposed curators in the authorities were counting on. On the eve of the “Russian March” a number of supporters of the nationalist turn Russian politics was detained. According to Gorsky, some of them have nothing to do with Maltsev.

“Dmitry Shakin, Anton Smirnov, Alexander Gruzinov and Valentin Alekseev are all prominent members of the nationalist movement,” he says. “And “thanks to” Maltsev, they can be prosecuted not just for extremism, but for forming a terrorist group.”

When asked about Maltsev’s connection with the FSB, Gorsky replied that he was not ready to throw such accusations, in addition, he personally “does not have informants from the authorities who could confirm such guesses.” He called Maltsev a “number worshiper” who decided to make a “pajama revolution.” In many ways, Gorsky is right: tens of thousands of people subscribed to the nationalist video blogger’s channel, and only a few hundred came to Manezhnaya on November 5th.

I managed to contact one of the participants in the “Maltsev revolution”; he miraculously escaped arrest and was very angry with his “leader”.

- Why are you free now?

I myself don’t believe in my “happiness”. The fact is that I participated in this story together with my close friend. I came to his house, and we accessed the Internet from one device, it was a tablet with Telegram loaded on it. We planned to destroy our device if this whole story escalated.

- And what happened in the end?

Yes, they told me about the details of the interrogation, in general, apparently, they “fired” all the correspondence, but did not know that two people participated in it.

- What exactly were you preparing?

Specifically, we were going to blow up the building of the Central Election Commission. This was supposed to happen on the night of November 4-5. Besides the two of us, about a dozen people should have approached the Central Election Commission.

- What were you trying to achieve?

We were sure that he had not 500 supporters, but at least 50 thousand, we told him (Maltsev. - A.R.) believed. I'm 22 years old, my colleague is 21, we want the 90s to come back. Then people had a choice.

- Maltsev positions himself as a nationalist, and you are nationalists?

Ha, are you kidding? My mother is Kazakh, my father is Jewish. We are for it new life. We looked at Maltsev and his pens as a means to implement our plans.

- There are civilized ways of protest...

I’ll tell you a secret: everyone who was in our movement supported Navalny. Consider, Navalny is Lenin, and Maltsev is Trotsky.

- What are you going to do now?

I'll go to my grandmother in Riga. It's scary to stay here.

Still from video

Detentions of activists of the Artpodgotovka movement banned in Russia took place this weekend throughout the country. As the FSB of the Russian Federation reported, counterintelligence officers, in cooperation with the police, stopped the activities of cells in Krasnoyarsk, Krasnodar, Kazan, Samara and Saratov.

In Moscow and the region, the first blow to activists was dealt by operatives of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation, who, on the eve of the holidays, detained movement participants who were preparing to organize high-profile extremist actions on November 4–5. According to the department, members of an organization banned in Russia planned attacks on police officers and arson of administrative buildings in order to provoke mass unrest. “During the events, all members of the cell were detained. 15 Molotov cocktails were seized. The issue of initiating a criminal case against the detainees under Art. 30 and part 2 art. 205 of the Criminal Code of Russia (“Terrorist Act”),” says the FSB website. The department noted that in the interests of the investigation, information about the detained persons is not disclosed.

Already over the weekend, the Moscow police detained those “artillery preparers” who nevertheless decided to go to the protests, and, judging by the seized arsenals, the rallies were planned to be far from peaceful. The capital's headquarters of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia said that on November 5, in the central part of the city, police officers together with employees of the National Guard detained 302 people and took them to the duty stations of the departments of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.

“During the inspection, piercing and cutting objects, traumatic weapons, brass knuckles, aerosol cans with irritating gas, flammable liquids, masks, goggles, helmets, other protective equipment, as well as paraphernalia of the Artpodgotovka organization were found on these persons,” the statement said. Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Most arrests were made for disobeying police officers and violating the rules of demonstrations. In addition, 19 people were detained for hooliganism.

“Excuse me, but did you come for 11/5/17?” — a schoolboy with glasses asked me embarrassedly. Hearing an affirmative answer, he looked around in confusion and asked the main question of the day: “Why are there so few people here?”

In the morning, the area in front of Smolny and the surrounding streets were clogged with police cars and trucks with riot police. The “cosmonauts” looked around boredly. By 12 o’clock, supporters of the leader of the extremist movement “Artpodgotovka” (banned in Russia) Vyacheslav Maltsev were supposed to arrive at Smolny. He had been promising a revolution in Russia for more than two years, and its date had long been known—11/5/17. All this time, activists “were not waiting, but preparing.” And not just an ordinary rally, but a forceful seizure of power and regime change.

A few days before the cherished date, unprecedented activity reigned in opposition chats. The Maltsevskys passed the Molotov cocktail recipe to each other and discussed the burning of riot police. “Goals: capture of Smolny, the Legislative Assembly and regional television centers (from there you can call people to come out and support the protest).” “You may not be in the forefront, you may not fight, but you must come. Take sandwiches, a first aid kit, tea with you and watch history.” “Whoever does not come has suffered, a coward and a slave.” And everything like that. There were only a few hours left before the start of the “new historical era” promised by Maltsev.

But in fact, less than 100 people came to Smolny. Some of them consisted of schoolchildren who are now ready to support any rallies against the current government. Truckers huddled in their corner. A dozen elderly women nearby loudly condemned the low protest activity. One of them even put on thermal underwear and took extra socks with her in hopes of a revolution.

- Yes, everyone just left for Moscow! Everything happens there!

- All the men didn’t come! And the women came. We are a women's battalion.

The women attracted the attention of journalists, but the presence of cameras did not please them.

“Who did you come here for? For us or for Putin? — the most active “revolutionary” attacked the media representatives.

The police on duty examined each suspicious character. And among the latter, oddly enough, were “prepared” people. The first to be detained was a man who was carrying an entire arsenal in his backpack - an ax, pyrotechnics and gas masks. Two more boys had medical masks and brilliant green with them. The law enforcement officers, of course, also studied opposition chats and discussed among themselves. Even the day before, they read that this green stuff was intended for them.

A strange-looking man was detained with a bottle of either alcohol or a Molotov cocktail. One young man, probably hoping for real revolutionary skirmishes, brought with him several packages of bandages. “Why do you need so much?” - The police were surprised. But no reason was found for sanctions. In total, from Smolny, according to various estimates, from 7 to 11 people were detained.

At a distance from the police in the square, young boys in sportswear with hoods on their heads. They watched what was happening from under their brows, but no one dared to take any active action, although it could only be expected from them. These are the guys who, in theory, should form the core of Maltsev’s fans. But in reality there were much fewer of them than on the Internet.

Now you can no longer understand how exaggerated the discussions about the allegedly prepared Molotov cocktails and other weapons were. Even on the eve of the action, the FSB reported on the cleanup. According to the department, on November 3, in the Moscow region, the illegal activities of the clandestine cell of the Artpodgotovka movement were identified and suppressed, “planning to commit actions on November 4-5 in the form of arson of administrative buildings using incendiary mixtures and attacks on police officers.” Searches and detentions of Maltsev’s supporters also took place in other regions. So the protest was decapitated in any case. Maltsev himself has long been hiding from the law abroad.

Therefore, it is not surprising that the promised revolution in St. Petersburg turned out to be even more pitiful than other actions of the democrats. After the coup at Smolny failed, Maltsev’s supporters moved to St. Isaac’s Cathedral. Riot police and police were already waiting for them there, again outnumbering the protesters. And two more wedding processions and a group of teenage girls who were having a meeting with a certain video blogger.

“Let's all hug! I wish you happiness!" — the blogger exclaimed joyfully. The girls took selfies and didn’t even notice that they were in the midst of a potential revolution.

The police rather rudely detained a young man in a “Glory to Rus'” sweatshirt, who refused to take off his balaclava. Another teenager went to the station because he had pepper spray on him. The law enforcement officers hesitantly tried to disperse the small crowd a couple of times, but each time they seemed to give up on all this: they would disperse on their own. An hour later it happened.

Meanwhile, the inhabitants of the chat rooms living in a parallel reality continued to actively write messages. The fact that the revolution had begun was only the first step. There were reports of some “mass arrests” in St. Petersburg. Although in reality they turned out to be massive only in Moscow - more than 260 people were taken to police departments there. The dissatisfied complained that Alexei Navalny was taking to the streets hundreds of times more people.

The result was an amazing “revolution 2.0”: no activity in reality, but talk about “rocking paddy wagons,” “holding combat positions,” and “recruiting for a power group” on the Internet.

“11/5/17 failed. Time to prepare for revenge. I encourage all supporters to write to me for further regrouping/coordination. We can’t give up now!” — another anonymous person was already scribbling in the group.

Everyone was waiting for what Maltsev would say about this. Some already thought that he had “merged.” But during the day, the disgraced activist still got in touch with his comrades.

“Nothing happened... Nothing happened in terms of failure. We have taken a step forward. The revolution continues,” he said in live on YouTube.

Sofia Mokhova

The country's leading analysts believe that 2017 will be a turning point for Russia. Most Russian political scientists and economists have already repeatedly said that Russian state tends to repeat some “historical mistakes” with enviable frequency. If we analyze some historical events that happened 100 years ago, we can come to the conclusion that the question of 2017, which worries almost everyone today, is quite predictable.

Lavrenty Chernigovsky also said that the Russians would regret allowing the overthrow of their sovereign, because this would entail mass murders (all kinds of executions), as well as mass destruction of church monasteries (this is exactly what happened 100 years ago). The predictor said that a new anointed one would come to the country, and the “Antichrist” himself would be afraid of him, under whose leadership the state would blossom. However, he did not say anything about the new revolution. Moreover, if you look at the predictions about the revolution in Russia 2017 from the most famous soothsayers - Vanga, you can see that none of them expected this event, therefore, this suggests that in the near future there will be no more upheavals in the country . However, recently a “new predictor” appeared on the Internet - Vyacheslav Maltsev, whose videos in in social networks they say that the revolution will take place on November 5 (he cannot somehow explain this particular choice of date).

Possible scenarios

The famous political scientist of our time, Sergei Kurginyan, calls the 17th year “the point of no return for modern Russia" You can understand this phrase in any way you like, and you shouldn’t be surprised, because a group of people involved in expert assessment say that today the state has four most likely development paths:

• “upper” revolution - this development scenario concerns the so-called “elite”, which can understand that in other countries it does not have any special prospects for development, but in its “home” territory some problems await it, and this can cause quite serious changes;
• split in power - it is already clear today that all members of the government have their own point of view on the events taking place in the state, therefore, all of them may have their own ways of solving problems, it is not surprising that the internal struggle between representatives of the authorities can become the reason for the development of a revolution;
• “lower” revolution - in this case, the revolution in Russia 2017 is inevitable due to the fact that the uprising will raise the people (this scenario can be considered the most likely);
• “post-catastrophe gathering” (the 1917 scenario will be repeated).

Sergei believes that the latter option, of course, cannot be completely ruled out, but to be frank, the likelihood of its development is minimal. History, of course, repeats itself, but each time period is still unique in its own way, so the assumption that a revolution will begin in Russia on November 5, 2017 can be considered untrue (this is hardly possible).

Is revolution inevitable?

One of the most famous bloggers of our time, Alexei Kungurov, is completely convinced that there is no way to avoid revolution. The blogger refers to historical facts and says that this event will happen regardless of the mood of the people (it cannot be denied that the majority of Russians are already accustomed to living in crisis conditions). Alexey analyzed the events of a hundred years ago and found out that then the tsar was deprived of the throne not by the Bolsheviks (as is commonly believed today), but by counter-revolutionaries, that is, all the glory of this event must be given to them. Why might events repeat themselves? Because this is the only way for Russia to raise its strength to a new level and become stronger than the West (it will be extremely difficult to achieve this goal otherwise). The blogger believes that in 1991 (when the union collapsed) a kind of revolutionary situation also occurred in the state, but although it changed a lot, it did not contribute to the country’s transition to a new level, therefore, in the future it will not be possible to do without such changes.

What will happen if the revolution does happen?

Today people have an extremely negative attitude towards state institutions authorities, this is precisely the reason why citizens of the Russian Federation are interested in whether the revolution in Russia will happen or not in 1717. There is no stability in the country, and the authority of government structures rests solely on the figure of the current president, who for many has long turned into something like a leader. Naturally, it is almost impossible to change the leader, but (as history shows) he can simply be removed, and the modern government, which, in essence, consists of the president, is slowly leading itself to exactly this scenario, although for the people this option may turn out to be catastrophic. A living example: one of the presidents of Mexico held power in his hands for more than 30 years, but after his overthrow, a long, bloody period began in the country. Civil War, which lasted 7 years, similar situations also occurred in Iran and Egypt.

Thus, the overthrow of the current government is just a matter of time, but no one thinks about what will happen after that. Where will all this lead? 20 years ago, a series of restructuring and democratic reforms were carried out in the state, but now there is no need for them. Experts believe that if forecasts for a revolution in Russia in 2017 come true, then Russians will experience the following events:

• a significant apology for the taxation system, the rates in which will rise to more than 50% (moreover, the likelihood of the return of taxation of inherited property in this case will increase significantly);
• closing borders (this will help prevent the flight of internal capital);
• the return of the privatization law adopted in the 90s;
• creation of new enterprises, but with one “reservation” - the owner cannot be anyone other than the workforce;
• state privatization of all large land assets;
• rapid growth of inflation and shortages of consumer goods (as in the 90s).

In general, a revolutionary mood in the state is unlikely to lead to anything good, so it would be best if the revolution does not happen in the near future, and the crisis ends with the country reaching a new level of life.

Nationalists promise a revolution in Russia in November 2017.

Source website

The REN TV channel showed a special investigation dedicated to the political union, which began back in 2011 on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow.

Let us remember that at that time a fairly large number of ultranationalists unexpectedly joined the liberal-minded townspeople, dissatisfied with the results of the last Duma elections.

The report says that the date for the start of the Russian Maidan has already been set. And no one is really hiding. The activist group calls itself simply "the junta."

Nationalist Vyacheslav Maltsev promised a revolution in November 2017. "5.11.17" is digital code. This symbol can be found in residential areas of Moscow and St. Petersburg, Kursk and Volgograd, Chelyabinsk and Yekaterinburg. On trains and trains. And most importantly, on social networks: Twitter, Facebook and other Internet platforms, which in the 21st century have become the engine of coups d'etat around the world.

“I’m not calling, I’m saying: it (the revolution) will happen on November 5, 2017. Our task now is to agitate as many people as possible for PARNAS,” - Maltsev said.

According to RenTV, Vyacheslav Maltsev and his associates supported the Ukrainian Maidan. It was then formulated main principle: Maltsev is against the “vatniks” and for a change of power in Russia. The project was called "Revolution 5-11-17". In one of the videos, Vyacheslav Maltsev showed the leader on Skype Ukrainian nationalists Dmitro Korchinsky.

Korchinsky noted that “the Moscow regime needs to be brought down, but I hope you can cope with this. It will fall, and we will help in any way we can.”

“We could cope with this through joint efforts, but you see, the situation is like this... I talk about this in every program. We hoped that the Maidan would become a springboard for the Russians who would wage war with Putin,” Maltsev explained.

The channel released a video shot with a hidden camera, which captured a meeting between Kasyanov and his close ally Konstantin Merzlikin with nationalist Vyacheslav Maltsev. Maltsev insisted that the Duma elections are a secondary task, the main thing is a change of power

“The people are already ready for something else. And by 5.11 they will be even more ready. What are they counting on? They really need to poison the air now, do some things that, so to speak, will please the opposition,” said Maltsev. “If we get into the Duma, then a completely different situation will begin in the country, because this is an entry into presidential elections in the country,” answered Kasyanov.

“The people will not wait a year. I’m telling you for sure. A decision needs to be made on impeachment,” Maltsev said. “Well, maybe, maybe,” Kasyanov agreed. “People won’t wait, and we will lose people. They will follow someone else. We definitely don’t need this,” Maltsev shared his opinion.

Let us note that this is one of the first meetings between liberal Mikhail Kasyanov and nationalist Vyacheslav Maltsev. Now they are already openly speaking together at rallies: number one and number two on the PARNAS list.

In fact, Maltsev and Kasyanov were going to use pressure on the Crimean Tatars through Mustafa Dzhemilev to get almost 200,000 votes from Crimeans in the upcoming elections.

“We need Dzhemilev to command them, and we will control them on the ground. Election commissions completely created from their people, you can do anything there,” Maltsev opened up prospects for Kasyanov. “Interesting, it’s very interesting. I think that you can get 200 thousand votes there, that’s a lot,” the leader of the PARNAS party was already dreaming.

The speech of another candidate from PARNAS - historian, professor Andrei Zubov - at the capital meeting was also dedicated to Crimea. He stated that under international control after the withdrawal security forces Russia from Crimea, the transfer of Crimea to the control of UN troops should calmly prepare a new referendum.

The parties discussed the scenario of a coup d'etat. Everything should begin with the “Russian March” on November 4, 2017. “We leave on the 4th for Lyublino, on the fifth we finish, we reach the Kremlin,” the liberals said.

Let us note that Mikhail Kasyanov’s consolidation of radical nationalists in the PARNAS party is not only alarming, it truly frightens many real liberals. Politician Ilya Yashin explained to fellow party members that nationalists simply have no place in PARNAS.

At the same time, there is no clear economic or political program, but only a call to the barricades. REN TV journalists asked Maltsev why he was calling people to Red Square, and whether he was ready to answer for blood. "We are ready to answer for everything"- answered Maltsev.

Before watching this film, I might have put a question mark after the title. But watch it for yourself, and all your questions will disappear too. The same goes for the question: to quit or not to quit?

I won't lie, the video is creepy. For it reveals the very essence of what the current political system. Although there is nothing fundamentally new there, this is perhaps the worst thing. The fact that the nightmare is a kind of behind-the-scenes routine that everyone knows about, but prefers to keep silent about. So as not to become a direct part of this nightmare.

And a couple more theses under the cut, regarding the prospects of the revolution and genetic garbage.

The fact is that these creatures (hardly anyone would call them people) are not some Martians who flew to us on flying tripods and got a job working in prison zones and pre-trial detention centers. Not at all. They, like all of us, were born of a woman. We went to kindergarten and school. Many of them may live near you. Are your neighbors. And there are many of them. Enough to form, and by force and cunning to support the political system.

And the main problem here is that people have to live in a state system that is formed by creatures that are only superficially similar to people, but who, in essence, are not people. And this is a really deep problem that does not have any quick and obvious solution.

Recently I saw a dispute on the Internet where some people convincingly argued that “Russia without Putin will fall apart.” In response, other people argued no less convincingly that Russia would collapse precisely if the Putin regime was not removed from power in the coming years. But both of them are mistaken, because today’s Russia will fall apart in any case, with Putin or without Putin. What with the opposition, what without the opposition. And the reason for this is objective and obvious - power in Russia is now on the side of non-humans. Inhumans can torture and even kill people, and this is for them with impunity. And people know this very well, but they cannot do anything, since they are few and disunited. Whereas non-humans are consolidated and armed, and this film is a clear confirmation of this. Inhumans have POWER, resources, and the ability to decide the fate of people and other nonhumans.

And this is exactly what we need to understand when we talk about a possible revolution in Russia. Revolution requires resources and a powerful revolutionary class. But in fact there is neither one nor the other. Watch the film and you will clearly see IN WHOSE HANDS THE POWER IN RUSSIA IS NOW. And whoever has the power is the one who rules. This is an axiom. Unfortunately for Russia, these creatures are apparently incapable of steering the system toward greater efficiency. This means that sooner or later the system will collapse under the influence of external competition. Yes, yes, Russia has a two-billion-strong China at its side, by the way. And the Chinese system, judging by all the signs, is actually more effective than the current Russian one. And in order to beat this system, power and authority in Russia must pass into the hands of the people. Moreover, this should be everywhere. Not only in the central office (where the concentration of people is more or less high), but also everywhere in the field. And this again raises the question of a revolutionary class, which in fact does not exist in modern Russia. Even if there is a mass rebellion - there is no one to catch the falling standard, some are too stupid, others are too weak, others are incapable of playing in a team - it will be mostly non-humans who will remain at the helm everywhere.

And you know, oddly enough, after watching this film, for some reason I remembered Andreas Breivik, who killed 77 people and now lives in a Norwegian prison, like in a sanatorium. And in Russia, when a person is arrested whose guilt has not yet been proven, he ends up in a pre-trial detention center, at the complete disposal of such mutants. And even if he is marinated there for a couple of years, and then released “due to lack of composition” or “due to lack of evidence,” his mood, to put it mildly, will be spoiled. Of course, if he remains alive and does not “hang himself with a belt” or “throw himself out of a window.”